From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rainer M Krug Subject: Re: "Generic" Source block language specification? Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:03:52 +0100 Message-ID: <50B24168.5050704@gmail.com> References: <50ACE060.4030207@gmail.com> <87vccw8a11.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Rainer@krugs.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56622) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcegZ-0003Xl-Hd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 11:04:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcegV-0000cG-0F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 11:03:59 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:39564) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcegU-0000cC-Q9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 11:03:54 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id gg4so1365935wgb.30 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 08:03:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87vccw8a11.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jambunathan K Cc: emacs-orgmode , Rainer@krugs.de, Nicolas Goaziou -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 23/11/12 19:11, Jambunathan K wrote: > Rainer M Krug writes: > >> Hi >> >> I have in a document a definition of a projection, which is essentially a text as follow: >> >> #+BEGIN_src +proj=aea +lat_1=-28.25 +lat_2=-29.75 +lat_0=29 +lon_0=30.75 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 >> +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs #+END_src >> >> Now this does obviously not export, as the source block language is missing. Is there a way >> that I can get the same formating of the source in the exportes output but without the syntax >> highlighting? >> >> BEGIN_EXAMPLE END_EXAMPLE >> >> is similar, but I would like the block to be formated as the SRC blocks. > > Marking the src block as `fundamental' has a drawback. One can no longer have in-buffer > fontification of src blocks. But this only applies for this source block, for which no message is defined anyway and consequently no highlighting is usefull (at the moment)? Or do I miss something in your argument? Rainer > > A better option would be to have a custom variable which produces black-and-white src blocks on > export. > > ODT already has this option. > > C-h v org-e-odt-fontify-srcblocks RET > > I am CCing Nicolas, to check whether he would be interested in introducing an export knob for > this. > >> Thanks, Rainer > - -- Rainer M. Krug, PhD (Conservation Ecology, SUN), MSc (Conservation Biology, UCT), Dipl. Phys. (Germany) Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology Stellenbosch University South Africa Tel : +33 - (0)9 53 10 27 44 Cell: +33 - (0)6 85 62 59 98 Fax : +33 - (0)9 58 10 27 44 Fax (D): +49 - (0)3 21 21 25 22 44 email: Rainer@krugs.de Skype: RMkrug -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlCyQWcACgkQoYgNqgF2egpqAgCeKL/mg3oqXZLHoCi2ijAkJW1L nCMAn0wJXsul485qXJsJ/gk3DuGfMq2u =9O5N -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----