From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rainer M Krug Subject: Re: "Generic" Source block language specification? Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:28:45 +0100 Message-ID: <50B2392D.6030201@gmail.com> References: <50ACE060.4030207@gmail.com> <87vccw8a11.fsf@gmail.com> <87sj7y4jbe.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58965) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tce8b-0004HI-0K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:28:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tce8Z-0008VA-Od for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:28:52 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:39383) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tce8Z-0008V6-Hz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 10:28:51 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hn17so1968287wib.12 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 07:28:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87sj7y4jbe.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Rainer@krugs.de, emacs-orgmode , Jambunathan K -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 25/11/12 01:28, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Jambunathan K writes: > >> Rainer M Krug writes: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> I have in a document a definition of a projection, which is essentially a text as follow: >>> >>> #+BEGIN_src +proj=aea +lat_1=-28.25 +lat_2=-29.75 +lat_0=29 +lon_0=30.75 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 >>> +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs #+END_src >>> >>> Now this does obviously not export, as the source block language is missing. Is there a way >>> that I can get the same formating of the source in the exportes output but without the >>> syntax highlighting? >>> >>> BEGIN_EXAMPLE END_EXAMPLE >>> >>> is similar, but I would like the block to be formated as the SRC blocks. >> >> Marking the src block as `fundamental' has a drawback. One can no longer have in-buffer >> fontification of src blocks. >> >> A better option would be to have a custom variable which produces black-and-white src blocks >> on export. >> >> ODT already has this option. >> >> C-h v org-e-odt-fontify-srcblocks RET >> >> I am CCing Nicolas, to check whether he would be interested in introducing an export knob for >> this. > > I still don't get what is wrong with example blocks (wrt export). Would someone care to > elaborate? Yes. In a document, I have several source blocks with "real" code (i.e. bash and R in this case) Now I have one block, which is not really source code, but which is "kind of" source code, in my case a definition of a projection for a GIS project. Now I would like to have this definition of the projection displayed in the exported document as the other source blocks, If I put it into an EXAMPLE block, it is exported to LaTeX as verbatin and not listing, and all customisations ai have for listings (smaller font, grey background, ...) do *not* apply to the EXAMPLE block, but woyuld to a "fundamental" source block. So the EXAMPLE block is in this case not equivalent to the fundamental source block. Hope this clarifies the difference, Cheers, Rainer > > > Regards, > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlCyOSUACgkQoYgNqgF2egrxdACeKk1/9hvuGv4PGEj9EAXipjOK CW8An0KJAUM0ejDcy9n1Gq2jxEHkvmZp =oKbK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----