From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Moe Subject: Re: [BUG] [ODT] ODT export (old) fails with wrong-type-argument Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:12:54 +0200 Message-ID: <5087F766.4010309@christianmoe.com> References: <507D1A13.7060702@christianmoe.com> <87sj942coy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Reply-To: mail@christianmoe.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33280) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TR1dl-0005uq-PH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:09:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TR1df-0006lk-T0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:09:01 -0400 Received: from b1.hitrost.net ([91.185.211.67]:40390) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TR1df-0006lY-MA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:08:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87sj942coy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Org Mode Hi, I confirm -- this is fixed in release_7.9.2-513-gad17c4. Thanks! Yours, Christian On 10/24/12 3:59 PM, Bastien wrote: > Hi Christian, > > Christian Moe writes: > >> When I try to export to ODT (without invoking the new exporter or >> anything), I get: >> >> OpenDocument export failed: Wrong type argument: stringp, >> (org-export-odt-preprocess-latex-fragments) >> >> This also happens in a document with no latex fragments. >> >> I'm running Org-mode version 7.9.2 (release_7.9.2-458-ged698d @ >> /Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/Resources/site-lisp/org/) on GNU Emacs >> 24.1.1. >> >> Is it just me? > > Nope, this was a bug -- I've just fixed this in the maint and > master branches. > > Can you have a try and let me know? > > Thanks for reporting this! >