From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Arun Persaud <apersaud@lbl.gov>
Subject: Re: question/suggestions about org-refile
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:24:36 -0700
Message-ID: <505F37C4.7010405@lbl.gov>
References: <50439B49.9060808@lbl.gov> <878vc1tb4c.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<505F28B3.9030005@lbl.gov> <87a9wg7o9y.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35895)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <apersaud@lbl.gov>) id 1TFoz4-0004ZT-6Y
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:24:43 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <apersaud@lbl.gov>) id 1TFoz3-0007Bx-4p
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:24:42 -0400
Received: from ironport4.lbl.gov ([128.3.41.45]:61487)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <apersaud@lbl.gov>) id 1TFoz2-0007Br-Ul
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:24:41 -0400
Received: by padfa10 with SMTP id fa10so335068pad.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87a9wg7o9y.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On 09/23/2012 08:27 AM, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Arun,
> 
> Arun Persaud <apersaud@lbl.gov> writes:
> 
>> I used to have this set to file, but then I _always_ had to add the file
>> name even for local headlines. 
> 
> It does not require the file name here and now.  
> Maybe an old behavior.
> 
>> I now switched to ido using:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> which works very well for me, especially once I added the
>> verify-refile-target.
> 
> Nice.  Maybe you could add this somewhere on Worg?

sure, should I create a new headline "refile" on the tutorial place or
should it go somewhere else?

Arun