From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Re: latex export - skipping lvls breaks export Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:41:50 -0400 Message-ID: <5028.1277217710@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <874ogwmfx1.wl%sebhofer@gmail.com> <834ogvjsyl.fsf@yahoo.it> <8739wfmigm.wl%sebhofer@gmail.com> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47508 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OR4fr-0003QX-3c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:42:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR4fq-0004jj-1J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:42:02 -0400 Received: from vms173011pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.11]:48632) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR4fp-0004jU-UT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:42:02 -0400 Received: from gamaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173011.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0L4F00AFY7HQJ250@vms173011.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:41:51 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: Message from Sebastian Hofer of "Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:10:01 +0200." <8739wfmigm.wl%sebhofer@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastian Hofer Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Sebastian Hofer wrote: > At Tue, 22 Jun 2010 11:51:30 +0200, > Giovanni Ridolfi wrote: > > > > Sebastian Hofer writes: > > > > > I'm working on a customized latex-export-class for a CV. > > nice! > > > I noticed that if you skip a level in the outline structure > > > (cf. example below) it is not exported to latex. > > > Is there a reason for this > > IIRC it depends in how is written the LaTeX export. > > (I thought I've read recently this answer by Carsten, but, unfortunately, > > I can't find the citation in the list archive) > > > > > or could this be changed easily? > > IMHO skipping a level it's a bit illogical > > ;-) > I guess it depends on the situation, it may or may not be illogical. > Anyway, I don't see a reason why the user should not be allowed to decide himself or herself to skip a level. > If the outline tree were a real tree, skipping a level would be equivalent to chopping out a node somewhere in the middle. Would you expect the tree to stay intact? Tongue-firmly-in-cheek-ly yours, Nick