From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Thum <simon.thum@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: Birthdays, org-contacts and agenda filters - a bug?
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 19:15:57 +0200
Message-ID: <5026934D.4010709@gmx.de>
References: <500BDEFA.3090809@gmx.de> <87k3xfawj4.fsf@gnu.org>
	<502101CC.4070205@gmx.de> <87txwb82fa.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59917)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <simon.thum@gmx.de>) id 1T0FI9-0000TY-DO
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 13:16:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <simon.thum@gmx.de>) id 1T0FI8-0005TE-Bz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 13:16:01 -0400
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:37851)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <simon.thum@gmx.de>) id 1T0FI8-0005T1-1d
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 13:16:00 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87txwb82fa.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Thanks a lot, it works!

It is good enough for me, but it seems not to work with tag inheritance, 
and it could in general be better to allow tags to be returned from the 
sexp itself.

Anyway, jut a tought.

If you let me tinker with worg I'm happy to document this feature.

Cheers,

Simon


On 08/10/2012 12:30 PM, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Simon Thum<simon.thum@gmx.de>  writes:
>
>> let me just try again.
>
> This should be fixed now, thanks for the detailed explanations.
>