From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: missing autoloads / (void-variable org-version) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:04:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4f99c66e.6303b40a.79ab.012e@mx.google.com> References: <87vcknm43o.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <80lililrk2.fsf@somewhere.org> <874ns61nqj.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <80ehrap9xr.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51385) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SNWnj-00042p-3m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:04:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SNWnh-0005H3-2T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:04:34 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:58173) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SNWng-0005Bd-Q3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:04:33 -0400 Received: by wgbds1 with SMTP id ds1so8646wgb.0 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:04:30 -0700 (PDT) Resent-To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: <87sjfq2lov.fsf@altern.org> In-Reply-To: <80ehrap9xr.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:30:56 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org Hi Sébastien, "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > You think that everything related to the Test package would have been loaded > correctly. Not the case, "obviously"... More precisely: it has been _loaded_ correctly (i.e. it is in the load path), but the functions have been _autoloaded_ from a previous package. Looking for the package from the autoloaded function will point at the first matching package in load-path, which might not be the one from which functions have been autoloaded... Yep, it took me a while to understand it, so this email is a tribute to Achim's patience :) > Are we on the same wavelength? I think we are. -- Bastien