From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Bach Subject: Synctex --> Syncorg? Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:47:17 +0100 Message-ID: <4f0ed543.8c1b0e0a.7e1f.2b61@mx.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51745) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RlJzs-0005W4-U3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:43:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RlJzn-0000vL-Cr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:43:12 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:54404) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RlJzn-0000vF-60 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:43:07 -0500 Received: by eekc13 with SMTP id c13so303636eek.0 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 04:43:06 -0800 (PST) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello Everyone, I am interested whether something like synctex search and inverse search can be cooked up to work with org-mode. The codename `syncorg' was used in this conversation [1]. Would this be hard to implement? Just curious. Kind Regards, Michael Footnotes: [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2010-08/msg01253.html