From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Bach Subject: Re: emacs 24.1 and org compatibility Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 23:57:43 +0200 Message-ID: <4eab24b9.cd3fdf0a.05b3.37f7@mx.google.com> References: <4eaaf25c.1565df0a.4821.3115@mx.google.com> <87ehxwc01l.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38499) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJuOK-0007TL-FF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:55:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJuOJ-00025y-GU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:55:08 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:41363) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJuOJ-00024n-6c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:55:07 -0400 Received: by faat2 with SMTP id t2so1749307faa.0 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:55:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ehxwc01l.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Fri, 28 Oct 2011 22:51:18 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Tassilo Horn writes: > Michael Bach writes: > >> [nothing] > > I agree with all that you've said. :-) > Hm. Since my subject line is the only thing I said, that was easy. :-) So for the actual issue: After pulling emacs from bzr and org mode from git today, org-capture failed with error: void-function: org-pop-to-buffer-same-window After digging around, I found the definition in org-compat.el from the git repo and a comment within saying that "`pop-to-buffer-same-window' has been introduced with Emacs 24.1". I now require the org-compat from git repo instead of the one built into org-mode from emacs 24.0.90.1 since org-pop-to-buffer-same-window is not defined within that. I am not fully used to development versions yet... Sorry for sending only an empty draft and then some noise. cheers