From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
Subject: Re: (another) org-blog
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 17:04:32 +0200
Message-ID: <4ba43ddeb0df167f9a30aac7a01d2bbb@science.uva.nl>
References: <87pshhp5a3.fsf@tallis.ilo.ucl.ac.uk>
	<0f09341339d45f6e1b428c559e5081d9@science.uva.nl>
	<87y7w4m00g.fsf@tallis.ilo.ucl.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FpRUS-0003pF-PT
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2006 11:04:36 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FpRUR-0003of-E7
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2006 11:04:36 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FpRUR-0003oc-7k
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2006 11:04:35 -0400
Received: from [194.134.35.146] (helo=smtp06.wanadoo.nl)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FpRcx-0005rg-4k
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jun 2006 11:13:23 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87y7w4m00g.fsf@tallis.ilo.ucl.ac.uk>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On Jun 11, 2006, at 12:58, Bastien wrote:
>
> Sure.  I was thinking to rename it "blorg", but then i thought it
> would be better to keep the "org-" namespace.  So now it's called
> "org-b-log".

or org-blogging.el, for example.  At some point in the past I thought 
David might integrate blogging into org-publish - but I don't know if 
this is still an option.

>
> See the org-b-log 0.5 release:
> <http://www.cognition.ens.fr/~guerry/org-b-log.html>
>
> (I hope "org-b-log" is not too much confusing and phonetically
> conflicting with org-blog.  Please let me know if this is the case.)

If anything, it is slightly unusual to have two dashes in such a file 
name. However, I do not really mind as long as the file names, and the 
function/variable name spaces are distinct.

- Carsten