From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
Subject: Re: org-mode and Gnus integration
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 20:31:42 +0200
Message-ID: <4a5e11a199715653fec9f7071d9fe6ec@science.uva.nl>
References: <87bqgo98r7.fsf@memetrics.com> <87odknqni1.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ho1wB-0008Cl-0F
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 14:39:55 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ho1wA-0008CZ-9h
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 14:39:54 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ho1wA-0008CW-6k
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 14:39:54 -0400
Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <dominik@science.uva.nl>) id 1Ho1oF-0004wY-U2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 14:31:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87odknqni1.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On May 14, 2007, at 20:16, Bastien wrote:
>

> Here is a slightly modified version. I added a docstring and the 
> ability
> to be prompted for a keyword.  Of course, it would be better if 
> keywords
> where proposed as the history for the prompt, but i didn't find an easy
> way to "flatten" the `org-todo-keywords' list.

`org-todo-keywords-1' is a flat list of all todo keywords,
including the DONE states.
`org-not-done-keywords' is a flat list of the states that
are not done.  Both variables are buffer-local, and you
can get the value only in Org-mode buffers - i.e. you
need to get them from the buffer where you want to
store the note.

- Carsten