From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Thum Subject: [Solved] Re: Taskjuggler and installation Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 22:42:26 +0200 Message-ID: <4FD7A9B2.6020700@gmx.de> References: <4FCE6E54.40800@gmx.de> <3280.1338939995@alphaville> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43663) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SeXv7-0007ph-5h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:42:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SeXv5-00028N-5a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:42:32 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:51107) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SeXv4-000286-R9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:42:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3280.1338939995@alphaville> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: emacs-orgmode Hi, just wanted to say it was indeed emacs picking up an ages-old org-install.el. Thanks, Simon On 06/06/2012 01:46 AM, Nick Dokos wrote: > Simon Thum wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I am using org-mode's taskjuggler export on two machines (win7 standard >> emacs 23.3/linux emacs 23.4.2) with 99% identical configuartion. Except >> for one funny thing: >> > > What org-version? Do you byte-compile the code on both platforms? > >> Taskjuggler export raises an undefined function on windows. Yes, I do >> require 'org-install, org-mode from identical sources (git-sync'ed). >> Linux is fine. >> > > What function? > >> I am fixing this by adding a require 'org-taskjuggler, but that can't >> really be it. Any advice how to track this down? >> > > M-x toggle-debug-on-error RET > > and look at the backtrace to see what the call chain looks like. A > missing autoload perhaps? Why exactly 23.3 on windows and 23.4.2 on > linux behave differently is a mystery, at least for now. > > Nick > > >