From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Shaun Johnson <shaun@slugfest.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Bug: Footnotes badly positioned in HTML export [7.8.09
 (release_7.8.09.234.g4a35)]
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:52:33 +0100
Message-ID: <4F914E01.9040701@slugfest.demon.co.uk>
References: <4F8C1886.5070901@slugfest.demon.co.uk> <878vhu68wd.fsf@gmail.com>
	<4F8DC9A7.40405@slugfest.demon.co.uk> <87d3724v3w.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48480)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <shaun@slugfest.demon.co.uk>) id 1SLCOZ-0002kj-68
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:53:00 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <shaun@slugfest.demon.co.uk>) id 1SLCOT-0005GH-1p
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:52:58 -0400
Received: from anchor-post-2.mail.demon.net ([195.173.77.133]:51430)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <shaun@slugfest.demon.co.uk>) id 1SLCOS-00059J-Rp
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:52:52 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87d3724v3w.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On 20/04/2012 10:21, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Shaun Johnson<shaun@slugfest.demon.co.uk>  writes:
>
>>> Shaun Johnson<shaun@slugfest.demon.co.uk>   writes:
>>>
>>>> The attached example org file (t.org) with two footnotes generates the
>>>> attached HTML file (t.html). As you can see in the attached screenshot
>>>> (t.png) the footnote placement is odd to say the least.
>>>
>>> This is a limitation from HTML exporter: it requires
>>> `org-footnote-section' being non-nil.
>>
>> Ah, ok, thanks. Is this documented?
>
> No. I have pushed a workaround in master. Can you confirm that HTML
> exporter now behaves as expected?

Yes, it now behaves as expected on my real document.

Many thanks,

Shaun.