From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Shaun Johnson <shaun@slugfest.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Bug: Footnotes badly positioned in HTML export [7.8.09
 (release_7.8.09.234.g4a35)]
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:51:03 +0100
Message-ID: <4F8DC9A7.40405@slugfest.demon.co.uk>
References: <4F8C1886.5070901@slugfest.demon.co.uk> <878vhu68wd.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48987)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <shaun@slugfest.demon.co.uk>) id 1SKER1-0004GT-VN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:51:35 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <shaun@slugfest.demon.co.uk>) id 1SKEQv-0005Na-Lh
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:51:31 -0400
Received: from lon1-post-1.mail.demon.net ([195.173.77.148]:57473)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <shaun@slugfest.demon.co.uk>) id 1SKEQv-0005MC-G3
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:51:25 -0400
In-Reply-To: <878vhu68wd.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On 17/04/2012 09:48, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Shaun Johnson<shaun@slugfest.demon.co.uk>  writes:
>
>> The attached example org file (t.org) with two footnotes generates the
>> attached HTML file (t.html). As you can see in the attached screenshot
>> (t.png) the footnote placement is odd to say the least.
>
> This is a limitation from HTML exporter: it requires
> `org-footnote-section' being non-nil.

Ah, ok, thanks. Is this documented?

Shaun.