From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan BISSON Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IEF2b2lkaW5nIGRpdiBmcm9tIHNwZWNpYWwgYmxvY2tzIHRv?= =?UTF-8?B?IGJlIGluIDxwPuKApg==?= Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 20:41:30 +0100 Message-ID: <4EDBCCEA.3070308@gmail.com> References: <4EDB9965.9040400@gmail.com> <4EDBC298.5030907@christianmoe.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFE73C5B63D84B20E9D8D2105" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43374) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXHwN-0002Ox-FR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:41:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXHwM-000177-DH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:41:35 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:41785) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXHwM-000173-7h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:41:34 -0500 Received: by wgbdt11 with SMTP id dt11so5069071wgb.30 for ; Sun, 04 Dec 2011 11:41:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EDBC298.5030907@christianmoe.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: mail@christianmoe.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFE73C5B63D84B20E9D8D2105 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/04/2011 07:57 PM, Christian Moe wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I submitted a patch to this effect a month and a half back. >=20 > http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/979/ >=20 > Apart from uncommenting that line, I put in an org-open-par after the > div and rearranged a few lines to follow the same structure as other > similar bits of code. >=20 >=20 > Yours, > Christian >=20 Neater implementation, I vote for it :) Jonathan --------------enigFE73C5B63D84B20E9D8D2105 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk7bzOwACgkQC2YP/JcnKf2BFgEAoz+nym1thvbQoAnyPbEUwMZz ljQOsK74ZhSQVNwJgekA/0ociOorKoFe6stA/UWfCv+vwIZNNidMEgmKz54S53pt =e4M1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFE73C5B63D84B20E9D8D2105--