From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Goldman Subject: Re: HTML5 presentations Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:07:44 -0500 Message-ID: <4DFA5480.1070502@sift.info> References: <871uz54diw.fsf@member.fsf.org> Reply-To: rpgoldman@sift.info Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:32831) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXHuv-0008AJ-Ue for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:07:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXHut-0000Zz-GK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:07:49 -0400 Received: from mpls.sift.info ([75.146.46.193]:37955) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXHut-0000ZP-2t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:07:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871uz54diw.fsf@member.fsf.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org Mode On 6/7/11 Jun 7 -3:01 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote: > Vinh Nguyen writes: > >> After the recent org-mode to S5 discussion, I stumbled onto >> [these](https://gist.github.com/509761) code. It offers a way to >> export org files to HTML5 presentations. I think it looks quite nice. >> I see it being better than S5 in that no "ui" folder is required. >> What do you all think? Is it worthy of being incorporated into >> org-mode? > > Just tried it, and it's pretty cool! Easy to use and nicely looking. > > Bye, > Tassilo > > > I have tried the version here: https://github.com/twada/org-html5presentation.el and it does not seem to be ready for prime-time. Org-babel features don't work, and there seems to be not a clear integration with the org-export-preprocessor. See my two issues, one (not satisfactorily) closed, one open. Possibly this should be folded into contrib, so that people could cooperate on it more easily than when it lives off in a separate git repo, but it shouldn't be enabled for the unwary until it's been thoroughly exercised. Is there a "tries to use all features" org presentation somewhere that would serve as a good acid test for an export facility? It would be very handy to have that.