From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Erik Iverson Subject: #+begin_example broken when #+begin_src included inside? Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:30:42 -0500 Message-ID: <4DF54C22.6040606@ccbr.umn.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45705) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QVu6b-0004zy-M0 for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:30:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QVu6a-0004y6-Pr for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:30:09 -0400 Received: from pegasus.biostat.wisc.edu ([144.92.73.35]:50078) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QVu6a-0004ww-I5 for Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 19:30:08 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.117] (c-75-72-91-235.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [75.72.91.235]) (authenticated bits=0) by pegasus.biostat.wisc.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p5CNTvB0001713 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 18:29:59 -0500 (CDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Can anyone confirm the following: Export the following org-mode markup to, say, latex * a headline here's an example of a code block ... #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE #+BEGIN_SRC
#+END_SRC #END_EXAMPLE I get (only relevant portion included): \section{a headline} \label{sec-1} here's an example of a code block \ldots{} \lstset{language=} \begin{lstlisting} \end{lstlisting} So, somehow the begin_src block is getting interpreted as such even though it's in a begin_example block...I of course want the whole of the text inside the example to simply be in the output verbatim. Did a bug creep in perhaps? Thanks! --erik