From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Moe Subject: Re: [dev] footnotes improvements Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 12:48:01 +0200 Message-ID: <4DCBBAE1.9010106@christianmoe.com> References: <871v05f4ca.fsf@gmail.com> <4DCB89FA.9080500@christianmoe.com> <871v0444m9.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: mail@christianmoe.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43352) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKTKd-00068Y-Io for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 06:41:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKTKZ-00083O-Qf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 06:41:23 -0400 Received: from mars.hitrost.net ([91.185.211.18]:55422) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKTKZ-000834-Jw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 06:41:19 -0400 Received: from lk.92.63.17.213.dc.cable.static.lj-kabel.net ([92.63.17.213] helo=Celebrian-2.local) by mars.hitrost.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1QKTKX-0000nm-5g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 12:41:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <871v0444m9.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org Mode List On 5/12/11 12:04 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Christian Moe writes: > >> * HTML: works! >> >> One question: As is, adjoining footnotes `2' and `3' read as `23'. >> Could/should the footnote export know to put a comma between >> them:`2,3'? >> >> For HTML purposes, I think not necessarily, the separator could be >> flexibly added with CSS like: >> >> : #+style: > > Probably, but I didn't change HTML exporter. I just made it compatible > with the changes applied to the LaTeX one. Anyway, the footnote markers are run together in LaTeX, too. So I think a (customizable?) separator would be a reader-friendly complement to this new adjacent footnote capability. >> >> * Latex: backtrace: >> > > [...] > > Oops I had commented (require footnote) to see what happened and forgot > to uncomment it again. This should be fixed now. Yes, now it works. Did I mention how great it is that we can finally put links in inline footnotes? Yours, Chrsitian