From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Goldman Subject: Bug in :minlevel for INCLUDE Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 17:43:31 -0500 Message-ID: <4DC32813.5090103@sift.info> Reply-To: rpgoldman@sift.info Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38526) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QI7Gg-0000wv-Li for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 18:43:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QI7Gf-00048W-Lm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 18:43:34 -0400 Received: from mpls.sift.info ([75.146.46.193]:48303) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QI7Gf-00048S-Fs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 18:43:33 -0400 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org Mode AFAICT there is an off-by-one-error here. I.e., if I tell it that the :minlevel is 2, then my included level one headers get level 3, and if I tell it that the :minlevel is 1, then they get level 2. So it seems like :minlevel is actually being interpreted as a level *increment*, rather than a minimum... Best, r