From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Goldman Subject: Re: Having problem with latex export of image file Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 16:58:25 -0500 Message-ID: <4D852701.6010101@sift.info> References: <4D7EE18C.4030104@sift.info> <4306.1300165488@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <4D7F6E3F.6030709@sift.info> <7501.1300199991@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87ipvinl72.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rpgoldman@sift.info Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50413 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q14AI-0002RZ-VL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 17:58:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q14AI-0003dO-3W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 17:58:30 -0400 Received: from mpls.sift.info ([75.146.46.193]:60123) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q14AI-0003cY-0I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 17:58:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ipvinl72.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, Org Mode On 3/17/11 Mar 17 -4:35 AM, Bastien wrote: > Hi Nick, > > Nick Dokos writes: > >> I didn't look very hard, but I didn't find documentation on these. > > If Robert or you can provide a documentation patch for this, it would > be nice. It's not (only) laziness from me: since you stumbled on the > issue, I guess you can better explain what is at stake. > > Thanks! > I'm ordinarily willing to chime in with a manual patch, but this seems odd enough that I wonder if there isn't a bug that needs fixing. In particular, it seems very weird to me that the latex exporter would treat un-directoried pathnames as files to be exported as links rather than inline images *even if there is a #+CAPTION present*. Is it worth re-examining this, instead of documenting it? cheers, r