From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Shaun Johnson <shaun@slugfest.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Following links in an indirect buffer
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:08:29 +0000
Message-ID: <4D8215DD.9030103@slugfest.demon.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60593 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q0DuR-00076R-1k
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:10:40 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <shaun@slugfest.demon.co.uk>) id 1Q0DuP-0006gS-R8
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:10:38 -0400
Received: from anchor-post-2.mail.demon.net ([195.173.77.133]:60989)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <shaun@slugfest.demon.co.uk>) id 1Q0DuP-0006g6-Mb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:10:37 -0400
Received: from slugfest.demon.co.uk ([80.177.204.141] helo=[192.168.100.4])
	by anchor-post-2.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	id 1Q0DsV-0003xp-jT
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:08:39 +0000
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi all,

I regularly work in an indirect buffer created by org-tree-to-indirect-buffer.

Following an id: type link in such a buffer seems to always switche to the
base buffer even if the target is visible in the indirect buffer.

Is the buffer switching intended behaviour or is this a bug?

Following an ordinary link (like [[Target]]) does not exhibit this buffer
switching behaviour. However if the target is outside the visible part of
the indirect buffer the buffer will be widened and point will move to the
target but only after being told that there is no match and asked if I want
to create a new heading.

In the case where the target is outside the visible part of the indirect
buffer I would prefer it if the link was opened in the base buffer.

Again is this intended behaviour or a bug?

Thanks in advance,

Shaun.