From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Olaf.Hamann" Subject: Re: how to compare org-mode version to current file needs Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:38:32 +0100 Message-ID: <4D81C888.7010201@gmx.net> References: <4D80B033.2000308@gmx.net> <8762rip30n.fsf@altern.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59350 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q08jz-0003Yu-ED for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 04:39:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q08jx-0003Yk-I9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 04:39:30 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:33193) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q08jx-0003YN-4k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 04:39:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8762rip30n.fsf@altern.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien , Emacs-orgmode mailing list Hi Bastien, I'm using head of git repository and Eric Schulte has just added a feature to org-babel, which I do use very often (expanding macros in src blocks). Tangling without that new feature produce corrupt code files. So I would like to give a hint to myself (as I run different Emacse in various virtual machines) and perhaps to colleques, if they would like to use the org-file as well. So if that feature will be still included in next stable org-mode release, I can compare to string =org-version= less or greater 7.5 but in the meantime I would like to compare to a certain git revision. I have to take a look into git manual, right? Thank you very much Olaf Am 17.03.2011 08:18, schrieb Bastien: > Hi Olaf, > > "Olaf.Hamann" writes: > >> is there any org-mode expression for saying "this org-file needs >> org-version> xxx" > No. In what case is it useful? Org tries to be backward compatible > and can export any _old_ .org formatted file I can think of. > > Do you have an example where it is needed? >