From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ian Barton <lists@manor-farm.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug] body-only Export Option Adds Extra html Tags.
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:02:59 +0000
Message-ID: <4D766F53.8090006@manor-farm.org>
References: <4D751FA6.2000703@manor-farm.org>	<4D761A29.4030004@manor-farm.org>
	<87mxl53dmx.fsf@univ-nantes.fr> <87fwqx3csc.fsf@univ-nantes.fr>
Reply-To: lists@manor-farm.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55004 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Px1FR-00083O-Dw
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 13:03:06 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lists@manor-farm.org>) id 1Px1FQ-0008AG-7d
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 13:03:05 -0500
Received: from mail.ian-barton.com ([109.74.196.44]:54063
	helo=li40-130.members.linode.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lists@manor-farm.org>) id 1Px1FQ-000891-0e
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 13:03:04 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87fwqx3csc.fsf@univ-nantes.fr>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Manuel Giraud <manuel.giraud@univ-nantes.fr>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On 08/03/11 14:30, Manuel Giraud wrote:
> Manuel Giraud<manuel.giraud@univ-nantes.fr>  writes:
>
>> Ian Barton<lists@manor-farm.org>  writes:
>>
>>> So it looks like SHA:
>>>
>>> da8dc7bba72613131f97a28f1c4a912b8d85d7cc Rewrite the handling of HTML
>>> preamble/postamble caused the problem.
>>
>> I'll have a look at that. Is the</div>  and</body>  with no opening a
>> normal behaviour for the :body-only option ?
>
> Ok this one was easy. Here's a patch that correct the body-only
> behaviour.
>
>

Thanks, I have tested the patch and can confirm it fixes the problem.

Ian.