From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Erik Iverson Subject: Re: [babel] common lisp / slime evaluation in org-mode Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:49:48 -0600 Message-ID: <4D53443C.5000808@ccbr.umn.edu> References: <4D52CF48.9030906@ccbr.umn.edu> <87pqr0oej4.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51348 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PnLe0-0003Qq-Vk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:48:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PnLdx-00014V-Gb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:48:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87pqr0oej4.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Schulte Cc: dto@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode On 02/09/2011 07:18 PM, Eric Schulte wrote: > Hi Erik, > > I've been switching from Clojure to Common Lisp myself, and have also > found that there are some issues with ob-lisp.el (although I've been too > busy recently to look closely at them). > > ob-clojure.el works well, and uses slime for code evaluation -- and it > has a simpler setup than ob-lisp -- so maybe it would be possible to > port the code in ob-clojure over to common lisp? > > I'll be happy to help get ob-lisp.el into shape once I have a free > moment... Great, in the mean time, I'll definitely take a stab at it and submit a patch if I fix my issue. Thanks for the tip! --Erik