From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Erik Iverson Subject: Re: [babel] common lisp / slime evaluation in org-mode Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 12:54:37 -0600 Message-ID: <4D52E2ED.8040704@ccbr.umn.edu> References: <4D52CF48.9030906@ccbr.umn.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40311 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PnFBc-00077M-CO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 13:54:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PnFBa-0008Qj-Kh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 13:54:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4D52CF48.9030906@ccbr.umn.edu> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode , dto@gnu.org > Looking at the code in ob-lisp.el, I think I see why this is > happening, but don't know enough about SLIME yet to make it work. It > seems that line that calls =eval-slime= would need to be changed to > =eval-slime-buffer= after dumping the code block into a temporary > buffer. However, that didn't quite work since that function > (=slime-eval-buffer=) doesn't appear to actually return the final > value. I of course meant slime-eval and slime-eval-buffer above...