From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rainer Stengele Subject: Re: Re: moving in the agenda view is slow Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:53:31 +0100 Message-ID: <4CF36A0B.5060901@diplan.de> References: <877hfzbsaj.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <32269.1290826390@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <4CF0E9D0.3010302@diplan.de> <589.1290877232@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <4CF14D17.1010905@online.de> <11315.1290885811@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <4CF1740B.6030405@online.de> <87pqtp73jw.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <25801.1290972566@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <4CF2B010.9040904@diplan.de> <3201.1290979966@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <8762vh5c9a.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <8306.1290983467@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53783 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PMzUN-0003N5-Ni for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:53:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PMzUL-0001FS-Ds for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:53:35 -0500 Received: from ns.diplan.de ([212.34.188.4]:51574 helo=mail.diplan.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PMzUL-0001Eq-56 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 03:53:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8306.1290983467@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: Eric S Fraga , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Am 28.11.2010 23:31, schrieb Nick Dokos: > Eric S Fraga wrote: > >> Nick Dokos writes: >> >> [...] >> >>> Eric, do you encounter this problem on Emacs/Windows XP as well? Has >>> anybody encountered this problem on anything *but* Emacs/Windows XP? >> All my systems run Linux (Debian testing+unstable mix) so it's not the >> OS. >> > OK, thanks. It also eliminates the window system (unless Rainer is running > X on Windows), so it looks like an emacs problem. > > Nick No, I am running Windows XP, native Windows Emacs "GNU Emacs 23.1.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2009-11-04 on LENNART-69DE564 (patched)" Rainer