From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_R=F6hler?= Subject: Re: C-c / r key-setting bug (?) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:34:24 +0200 Message-ID: <4CC04160.1070506@easy-emacs.de> References: <4CC017E4.8040005@easy-emacs.de> <4CC027AD.5010902@easy-emacs.de> <4CC0354F.8020205@easy-emacs.de> <5AB3A2E2-2ECE-4789-8C20-D3D807B5F55B@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50143 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8vZG-0001xO-L8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:52:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8vIr-0000lb-31 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:35:34 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:60431) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8vIq-0000l3-NX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:35:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5AB3A2E2-2ECE-4789-8C20-D3D807B5F55B@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode Am 21.10.2010 15:00, schrieb Carsten Dominik: > > On Oct 21, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Andreas Röhler wrote: > >> [ ... ] >>>>> C-c / will prompt for another key and then dispatch depending on that >>>>> key. >>>>> Many do. >>>> >>>> Hmm, that would fit into the already mentioned coding-style category. >>>> Is it wise to do it that way? >>>> For example M-x describe-mode fails telling about these keys. >>>> Are reasons for this? >>> >>> Yes. There are not enough keys, unless I introduce a larger number >>> of full-scale prefix keys. And it is much easier to remember just `C-c >>> /' and then get a friendly prompt for a number of options. For >>> interactive use, I think this is just perfect. >>> >>> Now, if you want to write programs based on these functions, then you >>> want to have the real command names. This is one of the reasons why I >>> like to have them in the manual, for look up. >>> >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm following, thanks for the explanation. >> Remains a describe-mode bug than (?) > > I would not call it a bug. Describe-mode looks at the key maps, it > cannot look into the functions. > OK, but can't you make it known to the keymap? Cheers