From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Erik Iverson <eriki@ccbr.umn.edu>
Subject: Re: Re: Org now fontifies code blocks
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:42:42 -0500
Message-ID: <4C87D922.40109@ccbr.umn.edu>
References: <AANLkTimrVKE2wzz+T2fwQuDFLiB_ZNW8OC3X4SNRfn7V@mail.gmail.com>	<8739uvw0hg.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk>
	<87vd7j1nck.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk>	<87lj7kqh3f.fsf_-_@stats.ox.ac.uk>
	<874oe6pwew.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk>	<i636lo$922$1@dough.gmane.org>	<AANLkTi=ii=TmTXn=fZEBTpCyb88Ltu6BoiG7gPbdmW2F@mail.gmail.com>	<87mxrug1x9.fsf@gnu.org>	<AANLkTikOmnnWC93by+xyk38ukpGVeCot+UUN2ux2X+P-@mail.gmail.com>	<87sk1lmzyo.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk>	<AANLkTin8tGnqzNazMcbwzLaOsKG1eU+uQqO+xRGoNbZC@mail.gmail.com>	<878w3dxzo0.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk>
	<877hiwb3kw.fsf@gnu.org> <87occ8rsly.fsf@mundaneum.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52463 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OtPbi-00019o-P7
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:42:55 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <eriki@ccbr.umn.edu>) id 1OtPbh-0004tr-Ci
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:42:54 -0400
Received: from walleye.ccbr.umn.edu ([128.101.116.11]:1975)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <eriki@ccbr.umn.edu>) id 1OtPbh-0004sH-6q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:42:53 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87occ8rsly.fsf@mundaneum.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: =?UTF-8?B?U8OpYmFzdGllbiBWYXViYW4=?= <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org



S=C3=A9bastien Vauban wrote:
> Hi Bastien and Dan,
>=20
> Bastien wrote:
>> Dan Davison <davison@stats.ox.ac.uk> writes:
>>
>>> (We badly need a customize group for these org-src but non-babel
>>> variables[1]. That suggests to me subsuming the "Babel" group (Should=
 be
>>> "Org Babel" for consistency?) within a new group, perhaps "Org Code" =
or
>>> "Org Src" or "Org Source Code" ? Views?
>> I find "Org Code" and "Org Source Code" rather ambiguous. "Org Src" is
>> better but still a bit too general IMHO.
>>
>> "Org Src Block"?
>=20
> The terminology of such code blocks in Noweb was "scraps". We often see
> "snippets" as well, but (not being English-native), that can be more fo=
r pure
> text (not specifically code).
>=20
> Then, it could be "Org Scraps" or similar variants.

Or "chunk", which I subjectively find the most phonetically pleasing.