From: Michael Brand <michael.brand@alumni.ethz.ch>
To: Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr>, Herbert Sitz <hesitz@gmail.com>
Cc: rainer.stengele@diplan.de, Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Re: suggestion: simplify depth stepping of document structure (outline) visibility
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:59:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C80AAE5.8080505@alumni.ethz.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikAbQaXSJnHyZEXsUX5ULPK3jnSuvf1=RPwFYy_@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr
> <mailto:bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr>> wrote:
> > (2) the first press at C->
> > and C-< sets the "content relative view" to 1, whatever the initial
> > state was. Feels a bit unintuitive to me...
On 10-09-03 07:01 , Herbert Sitz wrote:
> Yes, I agree, starting from current view depth is a bit of polish that
> should be added.
And what would one expect from the absolute variant (currently with
C-u) that also resets to the depth of the heading at point?
My point of view is different: First this current behavior is clearly
intended as an alternative for the absolute `C-u 3 S-Tab' but without
the need of counting manually, just like outline-mode-`C-c C-q' (hide
everything lower than heading level _at point_). Second I prefer to
keep things simple and don't like to think about bothering what the
initial view depth of
* 1
** 1.1
*** 1.1.1
** 1.2
*** 1.2.1
should be, when viewed as
* 1
** 1.1...
** 1.2
*** 1.2.1
with point on 1. Here I prefer to hit C-> repeatedly instead of an
automatic guess that can never know if one wants to see even 1.2.1 or
not.
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-03 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4AB0000D.5000004@alumni.ethz.ch>
2009-09-15 22:00 ` suggestion: simplify depth stepping of document structure (outline) visibility Michael Brand
2009-09-16 0:26 ` Bernt Hansen
2009-10-14 12:24 ` Michael Brand
2010-09-01 17:10 ` Michael Brand
2010-09-03 1:26 ` Bastien
2010-09-03 5:01 ` Herbert Sitz
2010-09-03 7:59 ` Michael Brand [this message]
2010-09-03 9:05 ` Michael Brand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C80AAE5.8080505@alumni.ethz.ch \
--to=michael.brand@alumni.ethz.ch \
--cc=bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=hesitz@gmail.com \
--cc=rainer.stengele@diplan.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).