Re: Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Makefile

From: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
To: Tassilo Horn <tassilo@member.fsf.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Makefile
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 21:52:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C51E509-1043-41DE-A8ED-DA8DA5592733@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87skjmastr.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de>

On May 3, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not  
> emacs
> -Q for byte-compiling org-mode?

Hi Tassilo,

this is a good idea, but -Q is not understood by XEmacs, and I
am not even sure about Emacs 22.

- Carsten

>
> I use a lot of elisp addons, so loading the site-lisp files takes  
> quite
> some time and some packages like CEDET even print messages while  
> loading
> and obfuscate the compile output.  I changed the Makefile to use -Q
> instead of -q which omits loading of site-lisp files, and it still
> compiles fine but much faster.
>
> Bye,
> Tassilo
> -- 
> Chuck Norris likes his ice like he likes his skulls: crushed.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode