From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Erik Iverson <eriki@ccbr.umn.edu>
Subject: Re: Development setup (was: Org-mode release 7.01)
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:32:20 -0500
Message-ID: <4C450AB4.8010202@ccbr.umn.edu>
References: <87zkxnja2h.fsf@gmx.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60840 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ob2ae-0004Ne-6B
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:29:53 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <eriki@ccbr.umn.edu>) id 1Ob2ad-0001jv-2n
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:29:52 -0400
Received: from pegasus.biostat.wisc.edu ([144.92.73.35]:50651)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <eriki@ccbr.umn.edu>) id 1Ob2ac-0001jm-QG
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:29:51 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87zkxnja2h.fsf@gmx.de>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sebastian Rose <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>
Cc: Emacs-orgmode mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>


>
>
> Suggestions:
>
> 1.) Could the original mail (the one including the actual patch, even if
>      modified) be attached to the autogenerated email, please?
>      This should be at the very bottom of the mail, because of length and
>      priority.
>
> 2.) And how about the subject?  The OP's subject is what I read on the
>      patchwork server.  Why can't that be (part of) the subject of the
>      "Accepted" message? E.g.:
>
>      [Orgmode] [ACCEPTED] org-capture with LISP function template
>
>      Maybe something that works on gmane et al, too.
>
> 3.) If there are annotations to the patch,  would it be possible to
>      include that comment in that automated message?  I don't now how the
>      patch is switched to accepted on the patchwork server.  But a simple
>      textarea field and appropriate POST variable would do, wouldn't it?

4) If traffic warrants it and as more users join this list generating more 
posts... perhaps a new list called emacs-orgmode-dev for development related work?