From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Erik Iverson <eriki@ccbr.umn.edu>
Subject: Re: [babel] `org-babel-tangle-w-comments' controls comment insertion
 in tangled code
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 13:41:08 -0500
Message-ID: <4C000E44.9050307@ccbr.umn.edu>
References: <87sk5c8497.fsf@gmail.com> <4BFFE4A7.9070300@ccbr.umn.edu>
	<878w746mul.fsf@gmail.com> <4BFFEE4F.5010608@ccbr.umn.edu>
	<88DCAA98-9A9A-4010-807F-2430121BAF22@tsdye.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35218 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OI4Uc-0008D8-Hi
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 14:41:15 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <eriki@ccbr.umn.edu>) id 1OI4Ub-0000uX-DX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 14:41:14 -0400
Received: from walleye.ccbr.umn.edu ([128.101.116.11]:1910)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <eriki@ccbr.umn.edu>) id 1OI4Ub-0000uL-6j
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 14:41:13 -0400
In-Reply-To: <88DCAA98-9A9A-4010-807F-2430121BAF22@tsdye.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>



Thomas S. Dye wrote:
> Hi Erik,
> 
> If the proposed functionality places comments in the source code in 
> whatever order they appear in the org-mode file, then the result will 
> likely frustrate literate programming efforts that rearrange code blocks 
> on tangling.

Yes, thank you for pointing that out.

> 
> Another way to get pieces of the org-mode file into the source file as 
> comments might be with a little helper function, 
> org-babel-copy-subtree-to-commented-code.  The source blocks could be 
> named so the literate programming facilities of org-babel could work 
> with them.

I'm not following this; could you provide a minimal pseudo-example of 
how you see this working in practice?

Thanks!
Erik