From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Erik Iverson <eriki@ccbr.umn.edu>
Subject: Re: [babel] `org-babel-tangle-w-comments' controls comment insertion
 in tangled code
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 10:47:17 -0500
Message-ID: <4BFFE585.6030906@ccbr.umn.edu>
References: <87sk5c8497.fsf@gmail.com> <4BFFE4A7.9070300@ccbr.umn.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55055 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OI1mM-0005dk-BX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 11:47:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <eriki@ccbr.umn.edu>) id 1OI1mK-0007Ha-Uz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 11:47:21 -0400
Received: from walleye.ccbr.umn.edu ([128.101.116.11]:1151)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <eriki@ccbr.umn.edu>) id 1OI1mK-0007HN-PF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 11:47:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4BFFE4A7.9070300@ccbr.umn.edu>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>



> ## 
> [[file:~/private/R-org-babel/test.org::*cube%20lets%20go%20to%20the][block-2]] 
> 
> 
> cube <- function(x) {
>   # a test comment
>   x * x * x * x
> }
> ## block-2 ends here
> 
> So, you mean that all three of the comments would no longer appear by 
> default?  Or you mean that only my inline function comment would not 
> appear?

Re-reading your post, I think maybe perhaps only my inline comment would 
*appear*.  If this is true, I like the idea.