From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIELDtmNrZXI=?= <jan.boecker@jboecker.de>
Subject: Re: Re: Emacs in a Term and Org
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:56:49 +0100
Message-ID: <4B8B9D71.8070901@jboecker.de>
References: <6fsr57-7ht.ln1@news.eternal-september.org>	<4B8B7643.8090704@jboecker.de>
	<4kds57-fot.ln1@news.eternal-september.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Nm3JK-0006rg-26
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 05:57:14 -0500
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57393 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nm3JI-0006qC-LX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 05:57:13 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jan.boecker@jboecker.de>) id 1Nm3JH-0006rf-Tg
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 05:57:12 -0500
Received: from mail7.worldserver.net ([217.13.200.27]:47681)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jan.boecker@jboecker.de>) id 1Nm3JH-0006rF-Gd
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 05:57:11 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4kds57-fot.ln1@news.eternal-september.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Richard Riley <rileyrgdev@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On 01.03.2010 10:22, Richard Riley wrote:
> Not really as they still use the arrow keys.
I am sorry, my brain must not have been fully functional when I posted this.


> C-c <right> is reported as undefined. Possibly someone else can confirm
> if it works on their setup? I tried it in urxvt and xterm.

I use urxvt with screen and just tried this; S-right does not work, but
C-c right does.