From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Neuwirth Erich <erich.neuwirth@univie.ac.at>
Subject: Re: make test on OSX
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 08:49:43 +0200
Message-ID: <4B618163-E050-4B04-BCD4-E3618FBDE5BF@univie.ac.at>
References: <E9E91059-ED38-4DEF-8351-BF7F5CF3FF8C@univie.ac.at>
	<87ipcn5ud4.fsf@gnu.org>
	<C804107B-423E-4294-B0C8-9C27BB582E3C@univie.ac.at>
	<87vcgn1cl9.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1485\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38659)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <erich.neuwirth@univie.ac.at>) id 1T1Awt-0001W8-2t
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:49:56 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <erich.neuwirth@univie.ac.at>) id 1T1Awr-0008Uh-7d
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:49:55 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87vcgn1cl9.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>, "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Mode" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

I am not (yet?) fluent enough in elisp to be able to debug other =
people's code ;-)

On Aug 13, 2012, at 9:21 AM, Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:

> Hi Erich,
>=20
> Neuwirth Erich <erich.neuwirth@univie.ac.at> writes:
>=20
>> Is there any way I can find out more?
>=20
> By looking for an actual bug related to the failed test?
>=20
> I have no other idea, sorry.
>=20
> --=20
> Bastien