From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mueen Nawaz Subject: Re: Shift keys when you have multiple todo sets in one file Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:43:42 -0600 Message-ID: <4B2C59FE.2040603@nawaz.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NLrBT-00043Z-Sd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:44:51 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NLrBP-0003xO-A4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:44:51 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33243 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NLrBP-0003xG-7C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:44:47 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:54238) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NLrBO-00055s-VQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:44:47 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NLrBK-0004Ha-52 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 05:44:42 +0100 Received: from c-98-228-137-161.hsd1.il.comcast.net ([98.228.137.161]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 05:44:42 +0100 Received: from mueen by c-98-228-137-161.hsd1.il.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 05:44:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 12/17/09 05:53, Matt Lundin wrote: >> The reason I kept it as separate sets is that I anticipate >> WAITING to be infrequent compared to TODO. So I don't want to put TODO >> and WAITING in the same set. I think there's another (more standard) >> way of setting the TODO state (I forget the shortcut), but for me the >> S-Left/Right is really, really convenient. > > I understand that you prefer S-left/right. However, I believe cycling > with C-c C-t will stay within the same set. Yes, but it's so much easier to use the Shift keys than typing C-c C-t. > As an aside, I've found that it's very fast to use the new speed > commands to change todo states. If org-use-speed-commands is turned on, > all one needs to do is hit "t" at the start of a headline. Hmm...I don't seem to have that command. Is this only in the "trunk" version? In any case, while a bit better, speed commands only work at the beginning of the headline. I often (always, actually) cycle through the todos while in the middle of the headline. It'd be great if what I asked for could be implemented - say, as a configuration option. It can remain as is by default, but those like myself can enable the cycling that I like. Or, I suppose, I could override the keybindings s.t. Shift L/R map to whatever C-c C-t map to... >> And incidentally, the S-Left/Right doesn't seem to do as >> advertised. It jumps from one set to the other only once (haven't >> tested with 3 sets). > > I believe the presence of duplicate DONEs above is interfering with the > cycling from state to state. If I get rid of the second DONE or change That may be it. Is this intentional, or a bug? Thanks.