From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_R=F6hler?= <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de>
Subject: Re: footnote renumber bug?
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:33:15 +0100
Message-ID: <4AE9DFEB.5090207@easy-emacs.de>
References: <350737.94767.qm@web28310.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N3YsV-0004gH-P5
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:33:39 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N3YsR-0004fm-BT
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:33:39 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52890 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N3YsR-0004fj-53
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:33:35 -0400
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:62588)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de>) id 1N3YsQ-0004Tk-B7
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:33:34 -0400
In-Reply-To: <350737.94767.qm@web28310.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Giovanni Ridolfi <giovanni.ridolfi@yahoo.it>
Cc: emacs-orgmode Mailinglist <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Giovanni Ridolfi wrote:
> -- Gio 29/10/09, Andreas Roehler <andreas.roehler@online.de> ha scritto:
>> when inserting a footnote between [fn:1] and [fn:2]
>> it's not renumbered at place. Got [fn:1],  [fn:3] and
>> [fn:2].
>>
>> Think mentioned that already and answer was it should
>> be a feature. Isn't it a bug indeed?
> 
> It's a *feature*!.
> did you activate the corresponding variable?
> 
> Manual:
> "Automatic sorting after each insertion/deletion 
> can be configured using the 
> variable `org-footnote-auto-adjust'."
> 
> hth
> Giovanni 
> 
> 

It did. Thanks!

Andreas