From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Roehler Subject: footnote renumber bug? Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:48:20 +0100 Message-ID: <4AE972F4.3090603@online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N3RcZ-0003yu-8M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:48:43 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N3RcU-0003xX-5Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:48:42 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38923 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N3RcT-0003xI-Nu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:48:37 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:60813) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N3RcT-0004aO-5h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:48:37 -0400 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode Mailinglist Hi, when inserting a footnote between [fn:1] and [fn:2] it's not renumbered at place. Got [fn:1], [fn:3] and [fn:2]. Think mentioned that already and answer was it should be a feature. Isn't it a bug indeed? Thanks Andreas ;;;;;;;;;;;; Below the test-case: * Erinnerung * Eins asdasdf asdfsdfa [fn:1] ** Zwei asdfsdf [fn:3] *** TODO Im Auge behalten :neutag: [fn:2] * Footnotes [fn:1] asdfasdf [fn:2] asdf dddd [fn:3]