* Possible Bug in Time stamp Editing
@ 2009-09-12 7:40 Ian Barton
2009-09-12 15:49 ` Bernt Hansen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ian Barton @ 2009-09-12 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
I have a remember template that inserts an inactive time stamp. If I
edit the inactive time stamp in the remember buffer using C . it changes
to an active timestamp. Shouldn't editing preserve the active/inactive
status?
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Possible Bug in Time stamp Editing
2009-09-12 7:40 Possible Bug in Time stamp Editing Ian Barton
@ 2009-09-12 15:49 ` Bernt Hansen
2009-09-12 17:48 ` Ian Barton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bernt Hansen @ 2009-09-12 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lists; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Ian Barton <lists@manor-farm.org> writes:
> I have a remember template that inserts an inactive time stamp. If I
> edit the inactive time stamp in the remember buffer using C . it
> changes to an active timestamp. Shouldn't editing preserve the
> active/inactive status?
C-c . creates active timestamps. You want C-c ! for inactive timestamp
editing.
-Bernt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Possible Bug in Time stamp Editing
2009-09-12 15:49 ` Bernt Hansen
@ 2009-09-12 17:48 ` Ian Barton
2009-09-12 23:17 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ian Barton @ 2009-09-12 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bernt Hansen; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
>> I have a remember template that inserts an inactive time stamp. If I
>> edit the inactive time stamp in the remember buffer using C . it
>> changes to an active timestamp. Shouldn't editing preserve the
>> active/inactive status?
>
> C-c . creates active timestamps. You want C-c ! for inactive timestamp
> editing.
>
Thanks. I'll add a section to the manual saying that if you want to edit
an existing time stamp, you need to use the same key combination used to
create it, or it will change from active to inactive, or vice versa.
Now I think about it makes sense, as it also allows a quick way to
toggle the active/inactive status of time stamps.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: Possible Bug in Time stamp Editing
2009-09-12 17:48 ` Ian Barton
@ 2009-09-12 23:17 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2009-09-12 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lists; +Cc: Bernt Hansen, emacs-orgmode
On Sep 12, 2009, at 7:48 PM, Ian Barton wrote:
>>> I have a remember template that inserts an inactive time stamp. If I
>>> edit the inactive time stamp in the remember buffer using C . it
>>> changes to an active timestamp. Shouldn't editing preserve the
>>> active/inactive status?
>> C-c . creates active timestamps. You want C-c ! for inactive
>> timestamp
>> editing.
>
> Thanks. I'll add a section to the manual saying that if you want to
> edit
> an existing time stamp, you need to use the same key combination
> used to
> create it, or it will change from active to inactive, or vice versa.
>
> Now I think about it makes sense, as it also allows a quick way to
> toggle the active/inactive status of time stamps.
Yes.
Another way to do that is S-up with the cursor on the bracket/angle.
- Carsten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-12 23:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-12 7:40 Possible Bug in Time stamp Editing Ian Barton
2009-09-12 15:49 ` Bernt Hansen
2009-09-12 17:48 ` Ian Barton
2009-09-12 23:17 ` Carsten Dominik
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).