From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Barton Subject: Possible Bug in Time stamp Editing Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 08:40:28 +0100 Message-ID: <4AAB506C.1030103@manor-farm.org> Reply-To: lists@manor-farm.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MmUIF-0001bv-G4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:13:39 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MmUID-0001bS-Op for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:13:39 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57503 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MmUID-0001bP-Mf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:13:37 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:23671) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MmUID-0002dF-FF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:13:37 -0400 Received: from li40-130.members.linode.com ([72.14.178.130]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MmNDp-00042Q-2u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 03:40:37 -0400 Received: from localhost (mail.wilkesley.org [127.0.0.1]) by li40-130.members.linode.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B56CC53 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 08:40:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from li40-130.members.linode.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wilkesley.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3XiVGH0mWafv for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 08:40:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.0.55] (unknown [217.146.125.41]) by li40-130.members.linode.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE4CBCC4E for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 08:40:30 +0100 (BST) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org I have a remember template that inserts an inactive time stamp. If I edit the inactive time stamp in the remember buffer using C . it changes to an active timestamp. Shouldn't editing preserve the active/inactive status? Ian.