From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Bell Subject: Re: Preventing (or mitigating) accidental deletion in org-mode Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:45:37 +0100 Message-ID: <4A918E51.7050004@nickbell.org> References: <4A9120DB.6030003@nickbell.org> <87my5qsigb.fsf@gmx.de> <20090823183941.GN30613@thinkpad.adamsinfoserv.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MfI4U-0001eT-0S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:45:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MfI4S-0001cx-Tn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:45:41 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44049 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MfI4S-0001ck-N9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:45:40 -0400 Received: from v-smtp-auth-relay-4.gradwell.net ([79.135.125.43]:39448) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MfI4R-0004Eg-NU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:45:40 -0400 Received: from [80.175.8.105] ([80.175.8.105] helo=macbook.lan country=GB ident=mail*pop3#nickbell*org) by v-smtp-auth-relay-4.gradwell.net with esmtpa (Gradwell gwh-smtpd 1.290) id 4a918e52.42de.b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:45:38 +0100 (envelope-sender ) In-Reply-To: <20090823183941.GN30613@thinkpad.adamsinfoserv.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Russell Adams wrote: > You're recreating what version control is for. I don't need all the functionality of version control, just a check against the last saved version to make sure I haven't inadvertently deleted too much. I've used Hg and bzr in the past and they work fine but I don't think I need them for this. > Version control is your backup and your protection against data loss. It's *a* form of backup. Another might be more appropriate. Thanks for the input Nick