emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* Hide drawers in indirect buffers?
@ 2011-10-01 17:23 Dave Abrahams
  2011-10-02 19:36 ` Dave Abrahams
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave Abrahams @ 2011-10-01 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: emacs-orgmode


When I initially request an indirect buffer for an item (especially from
the agenda) it shows up with all its drawers open.  I'd prefer it if
they were closed by default.  Is there a way to do that?

Thanks,

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Hide drawers in indirect buffers?
  2011-10-01 17:23 Hide drawers in indirect buffers? Dave Abrahams
@ 2011-10-02 19:36 ` Dave Abrahams
  2011-10-04  8:00   ` Carsten Dominik
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave Abrahams @ 2011-10-02 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: emacs-orgmode


on Sat Oct 01 2011, Dave Abrahams <dave-AT-boostpro.com> wrote:

> When I initially request an indirect buffer for an item (especially from
> the agenda) it shows up with all its drawers open.  I'd prefer it if
> they were closed by default.  Is there a way to do that?

To follow up my own post...

This is actually very surprising, because the entry shows up in a state
that can't be reached by tabbing on its headline, with all the drawers
open.  If you run (org-show-entry) in the indirect buffer it goes into a
less-noisy configuration.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Hide drawers in indirect buffers?
  2011-10-02 19:36 ` Dave Abrahams
@ 2011-10-04  8:00   ` Carsten Dominik
  2011-10-04 15:22     ` Dave Abrahams
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2011-10-04  8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Abrahams; +Cc: emacs-orgmode


On Oct 2, 2011, at 9:36 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:

> 
> on Sat Oct 01 2011, Dave Abrahams <dave-AT-boostpro.com> wrote:
> 
>> When I initially request an indirect buffer for an item (especially from
>> the agenda) it shows up with all its drawers open.  I'd prefer it if
>> they were closed by default.  Is there a way to do that?
> 
> To follow up my own post...
> 
> This is actually very surprising, because the entry shows up in a state
> that can't be reached by tabbing on its headline, with all the drawers
> open.  If you run (org-show-entry) in the indirect buffer it goes into a
> less-noisy configuration.

This is indeed a bug, fixed now.

- Carsten

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Hide drawers in indirect buffers?
  2011-10-04  8:00   ` Carsten Dominik
@ 2011-10-04 15:22     ` Dave Abrahams
  2011-10-16 11:26       ` Carsten Dominik
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave Abrahams @ 2011-10-04 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: emacs-orgmode


on Tue Oct 04 2011, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik-AT-gmail.com> wrote:

> On Oct 2, 2011, at 9:36 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>
>> 
>> on Sat Oct 01 2011, Dave Abrahams <dave-AT-boostpro.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> When I initially request an indirect buffer for an item (especially from
>>> the agenda) it shows up with all its drawers open.  I'd prefer it if
>>> they were closed by default.  Is there a way to do that?
>> 
>> To follow up my own post...
>> 
>> This is actually very surprising, because the entry shows up in a state
>> that can't be reached by tabbing on its headline, with all the drawers
>> open.  If you run (org-show-entry) in the indirect buffer it goes into a
>> less-noisy configuration.
>
> This is indeed a bug, fixed now.

Thanks.  So, just for my education, can you explain why running
`org-cycle-hook 'all' is superior to just `org-show-entry' (which was my
workaround)?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Hide drawers in indirect buffers?
  2011-10-04 15:22     ` Dave Abrahams
@ 2011-10-16 11:26       ` Carsten Dominik
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2011-10-16 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Abrahams; +Cc: emacs-orgmode


On 4.10.2011, at 17:22, Dave Abrahams wrote:

> 
> on Tue Oct 04 2011, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Oct 2, 2011, at 9:36 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> on Sat Oct 01 2011, Dave Abrahams <dave-AT-boostpro.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> When I initially request an indirect buffer for an item (especially from
>>>> the agenda) it shows up with all its drawers open.  I'd prefer it if
>>>> they were closed by default.  Is there a way to do that?
>>> 
>>> To follow up my own post...
>>> 
>>> This is actually very surprising, because the entry shows up in a state
>>> that can't be reached by tabbing on its headline, with all the drawers
>>> open.  If you run (org-show-entry) in the indirect buffer it goes into a
>>> less-noisy configuration.
>> 
>> This is indeed a bug, fixed now.
> 
> Thanks.  So, just for my education, can you explain why running
> `org-cycle-hook 'all' is superior to just `org-show-entry' (which was my
> workaround)?

Because this would also show, for example, archived trees etc.

- Carsten
> 
> -- 
> Dave Abrahams
> BoostPro Computing
> http://www.boostpro.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-16 11:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-01 17:23 Hide drawers in indirect buffers? Dave Abrahams
2011-10-02 19:36 ` Dave Abrahams
2011-10-04  8:00   ` Carsten Dominik
2011-10-04 15:22     ` Dave Abrahams
2011-10-16 11:26       ` Carsten Dominik

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).