From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Goldman Subject: Re: Patch for windowing problem Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:58:52 -0500 Message-ID: <4A670D0C.40300@sift.info> References: <4A5F8060.3060607@sift.info> <87k5281a7r.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <4A5FC780.5020909@sift.info> <87iqhrlp6o.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <4A60737E.3080600@sift.info> <87r5weqsm5.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <4A64C5F0.6070701@sift.info> <87zlazglxn.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <4A64ED9E.7040406@sift.info> <87iqhmtrsi.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <11191.1248236755@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87y6qhjgzo.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTbPS-0007PT-W9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:59:03 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTbPN-0007Nd-T4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:59:02 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52412 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MTbPN-0007NW-Pv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:58:57 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail-34.bluehost.com ([69.89.18.154]:45107) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MTbPM-00074L-4t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:58:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87y6qhjgzo.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien wrote: > Hi Nick, > > Nick Dokos writes: > >> AFAICT this has *not* been fixed: > > Yes, you're right - the issue I fixed was just a small step forward. > > Robert, I applied your patch, thanks a lot for it. > > I renamed it to `org-save-frame-excursion' and I slightly modified the > docstring, hope you don't mind. I will send this to the Emacs devs, I > guess some will be interested. That's a much better idea. I am more a common lisp programmer than an emacs lisp programmer, and need to remember that prepending "org-" is the equivalent of IN-PACKAGE ;-) Best, R