From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Goldman Subject: Re: Patch for windowing problem Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:30:56 -0500 Message-ID: <4A64C5F0.6070701@sift.info> References: <4A5F8060.3060607@sift.info> <87k5281a7r.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <4A5FC780.5020909@sift.info> <87iqhrlp6o.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <4A60737E.3080600@sift.info> <87r5weqsm5.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MSyZm-0002WE-38 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:31:06 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MSyZh-0002QM-Ib for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:31:05 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55631 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MSyZh-0002QJ-D8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:31:01 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail-107.bluehost.com ([69.89.22.7]:58068) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MSyZg-0000pw-T2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:31:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r5weqsm5.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien wrote: > Hi Robert, > > Robert Goldman writes: > >> If you are inclined, you should be able to run with this patch, and it >> should do /absolutely nothing/. That would be a good test, too. If you >> plug it in, and you use only a single frame, org-mode should not change >> at all for you. If it does, you have performed the valuable service of >> finding that I have made a big bug! > > I've been trying to use frames with Org and Org-remember. I can't > reproduce the bug you are reporting, so maybe it's an Aquamacs bug? > > Does anyone using frames in GNU Emacs can reproduce Robert's bug? > I will see if I can set up a test case, involving creating some frames, that might display this problem on vanilla Emacs. I'm afraid it's not a very high priority for me, since it will involve getting Org working on a different machine. However, I'm inclined to suggest that, if this is NOT a problem on vanilla emacs, and my patch does not /damage/ operations on vanilla emacs while making life easier on aquamacs, we can safely push it. best, r