From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Riley Subject: Re: export and containers Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 02:16:15 +0100 Message-ID: <49ac84e1.0405560a.1fdd.2c8d@mx.google.com> References: <49a91200.1438560a.6867.ffffb3e4@mx.google.com> <87eixikd1u.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <49ab92ef.0407560a.4681.543e@mx.google.com> <87vdqsz31c.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <95B3F1B7-98EE-4831-9FB3-1B7D34598061@uva.nl> <87iqmsyw4o.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <3B159DE3-C418-41C8-9422-E0743D789E2E@uva.nl> <87r61f7w3r.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <8296CDBB-B545-4819-99A5-58EDD20DC7DC@uva.nl> <49ac219e.0305560a.1bac.ffffac65@mx.google.com> <87d4czoisi.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <49ac3fff.0305560a.5cac.ffffede6@mx.google.com> <87zlg3mnr2.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LeJF6-0005wP-TT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:16:20 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LeJF5-0005wD-UB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:16:20 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52652 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LeJF5-0005wA-QX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:16:19 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]:37171) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LeJF5-0006ZW-F7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:16:19 -0500 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l27so15653fgb.30 for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:16:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87zlg3mnr2.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> (Sebastian Rose's message of "Tue, 03 Mar 2009 01:52:17 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastian Rose Cc: org-mode , Richard Riley Sebastian Rose writes: > Richard Riley writes: >> Sebastian Rose writes: >> >>> Richard Riley writes: >>>> I really dont see the plethora of sec-id# that are currently generated >>>> being really useful since they change on each export if new stuff is >>>> entered. This make existing CSS redundant unfortunately. >>> >>> The IDs in the section headings are not meant for CSS styling. That's >>> what the classes are for. >>> >>> >>> Regards, >> >> IDs are frequently used for styling as well as classes. > > > Well, in this case, since we never know the ID of a section in > advance... Or haven't known in the past. See other post. We probably need to be able to control the class and/or ID of individual sections at the higher level.