From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "George Pearson" Subject: Re: filtering the weekly agenda Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:58:22 -0400 Message-ID: <48F5CCCE.5278.C7A46@george.canals.com> References: <48F46FB3.10642.28660436@george.canals.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kq7pk-0001Wg-D2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:58:45 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kq7pg-0001UT-UX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:58:41 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37195 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kq7pg-0001U9-Eg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:58:40 -0400 Received: from shared9.whbdns.com ([75.126.177.135]:60140) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kq7pg-0003Co-4s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:58:40 -0400 Received: from c-24-128-69-40.hsd1.nh.comcast.net ([24.128.69.40] helo=[192.168.1.103]) by shared9.whbdns.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Kq7pd-00081l-3N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:58:37 +0000 In-reply-to: Content-description: Mail message body List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 15 Oct 2008 at 9:52, Manish wrote: > Since you already have efforts defined for your tasks, you could > consider adding a block to your agenda for tasks that have "Effort>x" > where x is the effort threshold. That could be another filtering option, like those I listed, but some of my project tasks are short so those would be problematic. My impression of the block agenda is that it creates its own display, rather than allowing one to create a filtered weekly agenda. Have I got this wrong? By the way, in the org mode manual, under "Custom agenda views", we have a section entitled "10.3.3 Matching tags and properties". However that section only describes matching tags, NOT properties.