From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wanrong Lin Subject: Re: Bug: monthly repeater does not work Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:30:45 -0400 Message-ID: <48625695.3020301@gmail.com> References: <48617123.4070905@gmail.com> <00B0CF00-B44F-4FE6-A63E-E4010E763264@uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KBW1a-0000JL-LZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:31:06 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KBW1Y-0000Fl-59 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:31:05 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41835 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KBW1Y-0000Fd-27 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:31:04 -0400 Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.170.191]:54032) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KBW1X-0006hg-M5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:31:03 -0400 Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k32so748398rnd.7 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:31:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <00B0CF00-B44F-4FE6-A63E-E4010E763264@uva.nl> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Yes, I tried the latest version and it is fixed. Thank you! Wanrong Carsten Dominik wrote: > Fixed , thanks. > > At least I thing so. Please get the latest version and confirm. > > - Carsten > > On Jun 25, 2008, at 12:11 AM, Wanrong Lin wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I just tried this: >> >> * TODO Test >> SCHEDULED: <2008-06-24 Tue +1m> >> >> And it does not work, meaning I do not see the item listed in the >> agenda of 07-24, 08-24 and etc. DEADLINE won't work either with the >> same repeater. >> >> Can someone confirm that? I saw the above with org-6.05b on Emacs >> 22.2 under Windows/Linux. Thanks a lot. >> >> Assuming the above report is not a false alarm, sometimes I feel a >> little bit uneasy after upgrading to a new version because important >> feature might be broken and my task may slip under my nose. Would be >> nice if there is an automated regression test, but I can imagine it >> would be very difficult for an interactive thing like org. >> >> Wanrong >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Emacs-orgmode mailing list >> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. >> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode >