From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Why not emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode in the Makefile Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 10:29:07 +0200 Message-ID: <484D8925-94EE-4C3F-ADF5-9487ECB06A4E@gmail.com> References: <87skjmastr.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <4C51E509-1043-41DE-A8ED-DA8DA5592733@gmail.com> <0ty6td12qe.wl%bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca> <87eiv4hod4.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M1G1e-0005D3-2E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 04:29:18 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M1G1Y-0005AT-Bm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 04:29:16 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42386 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M1G1Y-0005AF-6j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 04:29:12 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f162.google.com ([209.85.219.162]:62304) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M1G1Y-0000jd-0j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2009 04:29:12 -0400 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so4876797ewy.42 for ; Tue, 05 May 2009 01:29:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87eiv4hod4.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, David Bremner Done, thanks. I am using -no-site-file instead of --no-site-file, this seems to works best with different Emacsen.. - Carsten On May 4, 2009, at 5:36 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote: > David Bremner writes: > >>>> is there a specific reason that the Makefile uses emacs -q and not >>>> emacs -Q for byte-compiling org-mode? >>> >>> this is a good idea, but -Q is not understood by XEmacs, and I am >>> not >>> even sure about Emacs 22. >> >> at least for Emacs 22, it works. XEmacs apparently has >> "-no-site-file" as equivalent to "--no-site-init", so it would be >> possible to do something similar. > > Yeah, -Q is equivalent to -q --no-site-file, so the latter could be > used > and still we're compatible with emacs 22/23 & xemacs. > > Bye, > Tassilo > -- > "Emacs is not a development tool but a way of life." > - David Kastrup in alt.religion.emacs -