From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: [PATCH] org-narrow-to-subtree: prevent prepending text to the next headline while narrowed Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:11:32 +0100 Message-ID: <47EB340A-1D49-44F3-8293-BFAA47532B5E@gmail.com> References: <4B544258.4040305@jboecker.de> <20524da71001220850m5cba19dfncd458d994f0ec2b0@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NbrNj-0005rV-JV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:11:39 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45136 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbrNj-0005r4-0n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:11:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NbrNg-0001by-8r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:11:38 -0500 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:34003) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NbrNf-0001bp-JI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:11:35 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f213.google.com ([209.85.219.213]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NbrNe-0005g5-Tt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:11:35 -0500 Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so7285571ewy.32 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:11:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20524da71001220850m5cba19dfncd458d994f0ec2b0@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Samuel Wales Cc: Org Mode Hi Samuel, this remains a contriversial issue. However, since I made the change, I have not received any concrete reports of problems - so I guess it is working pretty well the way it is now. Case closed - until the next bug report :-) - Carsten On Jan 22, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Samuel Wales wrote: > I'm not so sure about this patch. > > Are you sure this will work with sorting headlines? Swallowed > headlines occur if end of narrowed region is at eol. What about other > operations, including user-written commands? Can we be sure that they > will not to swallowed headlines? > > IMO the behavior described as a bug by the OP is correct -- the user > should insert a newline after xyz (or org could detect that and insert > a newline depending on mode-require-final-newline or > require-final-newline). > > I think opinions might vary on this. > > -- > Q: How many CDC "scientists" does it take to change a lightbulb? > A: "You only think it's dark." [CDC has denied a deadly disease for > 25 years] > ========== > Retrovirus: http://www.wpinstitute.org/xmrv/index.html - Carsten