From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: how to customize (inactive) timestamp textual format Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:35:11 -0400 Message-ID: <4756.1277217311@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <20100620094925.GA20877@upsilon.cc> <08902A9B-0C7F-41FB-AC8F-BFC65F296B5E@gmail.com> <20100622072316.GA14230@upsilon.cc> <4C208DAD.2060109@manor-farm.org> <64F0D23D-3D32-482C-8F95-ACF82F0FEFCF@gmail.com> <20100622104109.GA17922@upsilon.cc> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46587 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OR4ZJ-0000Zz-DC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:35:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR4ZF-0003Th-Ko for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:35:16 -0400 Received: from vms173019pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.19]:65298) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OR4ZF-0003Tb-Hm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:35:13 -0400 Received: from gamaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173019.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0L4F008FA76NXU50@vms173019.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:35:12 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: Message from Stefano Zacchiroli of "Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:41:09 +0200." <20100622104109.GA17922@upsilon.cc> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Stefano Zacchiroli Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:37:16PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote: > >>>(I've only now noticed that the FAQ it not part of the installed > >>>org-mode documentation, at least not in my distribution package: any > >>>reason for that?) > >> > >>I think it's not included because it's part of Worg, which I think > >>is only available either in git or on the web. Maybe Worg should > >>be included in the standard package. > > > > No, I don't see why. It is on the web, easily accessible. > > People working offline? > Next time you are online, just git clone the Worg repository to your machine. Then periodically, git pull. Problem solved. Nick